Why Bill Gates Is Wrong On All Three Points

This week, Bill Gates promoted a three-pronged approach to responding to the coronvarius outbreak:

1. National shutdown at the federal level, and suggests 10 weeks

2. More testing. 

3. Vaccine

We think he's wrong on all three points.

First, a national shutdown would prove even more devastating than the current shutdown that is resulting in, by our latest estimate, more than $30 trillion in economic costs.

Also, expanding the current shutdown strategy does not even address the realities of COVID-19 -- that the vast majority of the mortality victims are over 70 and have a co-morbidity (heart disease, obesity, diabetes, lung condition, etc.). In Italy, 99% of those who have died are were 50+; 83% were 70+; just two percent didn't have another serious illness. Similar data hasn't been published for America, but the CDC's most recent report confirmed the findings in Europe and elsewhere with 80% of deaths in the 60+ age group.

So this gives the possibility that another "shutdown" approach may be better -- one that focuses on those who are vulnerable by age and co-morbidities. Plus, we don't have the correct data to know whether a further/longer shutdown is the best strategy.

Second, more testing only makes sense if the testing is strategic. Yes, we need to have enough testing for those who are presenting to doctors offices and hospitals with symptoms. But our current testing strategy tells us very little about the general population because we're only testing the sick. It would be like polling people at a Trump rally and trying to get a read on the nation as a whole.

Gates' approach also promotes the idea that everyone needs to get tested.That is not feasible and will only create more panic. More importantly, we need the antibody testing -- tests that look to see if you have already had COVID-19. And we need this testing to be done by state or region on a statistically valid, random sample basis.

Why? Because then we will know the level of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic cases there have already been but those people never needed to go to hospital or doctor. They just recovered. Just how small is the "tip" of the iceberg of our current positive cases and just how large is the rest of the iceberg of people who have already recovered? Here's why this is critical.

  • If just 1% of Americans already have had the virus, the mortality rate drops to something very close to the flu, about .1%
  • It 2%, then the mortality rate is half of the flu

Please note: we're not saying COVID-19 therefore isn't deadly. Since we started this pandemic with little or no herd immunity, lots could die. But the risk to the average healthy person would be very low, making it difficult to justify the current shutdown.

And third, the vaccine. 18 months if everything goes well. If they produce a vaccine before this time frame, DON'T PARTICIPATE, especially if you are healthy. Plus, I'm sure Gates knows that vaccines for coronaviruses have been very illusive. It may prove impossible.

 

 

 


Showing 4 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • elizabeth lowenthal
    followed this page 2020-04-04 13:14:34 -0400
  • Larry wallace
    commented 2020-04-03 10:18:05 -0400
    Media and Gates hype of Pandemic exposed by citizens checking hospitals that were supposedly filled with victims, empty!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pIMD1enwd4&feature=youtu.be
  • Ross Fairweather
    commented 2020-04-02 13:27:46 -0400
    Bill Gates, the WHO, and the Johns Hopkins Institute put on a huge PANDEMIC EVENT exercise (Event 201 – look it up) to determine the effects of a Coronavirus pandemic on the world. The virus they used to evaluate in their computerized models was nearly identical to the one in Wuhan. In their estimations, the virus would kill 68 million in 18 months. They held this conference and exercise on Oct 19, 2019, only 6 weeks before the Wuhan outbreak was discovered.
  • Bob Smalser
    commented 2020-04-02 10:48:37 -0400
    Gates. Self-interested as ever, amassing power and resources. Knows there is no penalty for overstating, as people will be relieved and grateful when the end result is half what he projects. Or less.
    https://nationalfile.com/president-trump-vs-bill-gates-on-treatment-fauci-has-a-100-million-conflict-of-interest/